Numbers

The Numbers

Auto Trader is one of the most economically pure businesses on the LSE: a single dominant marketplace running 63% group operating margins, ~45% ROIC, near-zero leverage, and converting more than 100% of net income to free cash flow. Revenue has compounded at roughly 10% per year over the past five years and the company has retired ~9% of its share count via buybacks since FY22 alongside a growing dividend. The single sentence that explains the chart-by-chart story: the business is unchanged, but the market just re-rated it from ~25× earnings to ~15× — the de-rating is the entire investment debate.

Snapshot

Share Price (pence) — 1 May 2026

493.6

Market Cap (£M)

4,290

Operating Margin (FY25)

63%

P/E (TTM)

14.6

Quality scorecard — is this a well-run business?

Returns and balance-sheet flexibility put Auto Trader in the top tier of UK listed companies. ROIC sits above 44%, the balance sheet is in net cash, free cash flow exceeds reported earnings, and operating margin has stayed in the 55%–70% band every fiscal year since the 2015 IPO.

ROIC (FY25)

44.9%

EBITDA Margin

66.1%

FCF / Net Income

1.06

Net Debt (£M)

-15

Revenue 5y CAGR

10.3%

FCF 5y CAGR

9.4%

Share Count Δ 1y

-2.2%

A franchise where ROIC stays above 40% with a net-cash balance sheet and free cash flow exceeds net income year after year is the textbook fingerprint of a structural monopoly running on near-zero capital. Predictability is unusually high — even in the COVID year (FY21) the group stayed profitable and operating margin only dipped to 61%.

Revenue and earnings power — 14-year view

Group revenue has nearly tripled since FY12 (£209M) to £601M in FY25, with a single COVID dislocation in FY21. Operating profit has scaled even faster (+250% over the same span) as platform operating leverage compounded.

Loading...
Loading...

The 2017 step-change in net margin reflects post-IPO debt paydown that eliminated most of the legacy LBO interest expense. Operating margin has held in the high-60s for the core Auto Trader business; the FY23 dip is Autorama (van/leasing acquisition) integration costs and FY21 is the COVID rebate to dealers.

Recent half-year direction

UK companies report half-yearly. Each point below is a true H1 (Apr–Sep) or H2 (Oct–Mar) result. The consistency of the trend — both H1 and H2 stepping up year after year — is the operating story the headline P/E does not show.

Loading...

H1 FY26 revenue grew 5.0% year-on-year — the slowest growth rate since the COVID recovery. That deceleration, off the FY22–FY24 low-double-digit run-rate, is the proximate trigger for the de-rating.

Cash generation — are the earnings real?

Operating cash flow has tracked or exceeded net income in every year since FY17, with FCF exceeding NI in seven of the past eight years. Capex is structurally tiny — well under 1% of revenue — because this is a pure software platform with no inventory, no fleet, no fulfilment.

Loading...
Loading...

Five-year average FCF / Net Income is 109% — the model converts more cash than it reports as profit, courtesy of working-capital tailwinds and modest stock-based compensation (under 2% of revenue).

Capital allocation — where the cash goes

Since FY17, Auto Trader has returned essentially all free cash flow to shareholders via dividends and buybacks. Buyback intensity has stepped up: from £103M in FY17 to £188M in FY25, retiring ~2.2% of shares per year over the trailing three years.

Loading...

The FY21 spike in debt repayment (£283M) was the COVID-era refinancing that left the company permanently unlevered. The FY23 acquisition spike (£152M) was Autorama (vans / new-car leasing) — the only material M&A since IPO and the only line item that meaningfully diluted reported group margins.

Balance sheet — fortress

Net debt to EBITDA was 9× when Auto Trader IPO'd in 2015 (legacy LBO leverage). Within seven years it became net-cash-positive. The current FY25 leverage ratio is -0.04× (net cash).

Loading...

The FY23 uptick is the Autorama acquisition; it was paid down inside 24 months. There is no debt-driven distress risk: cash on hand is £15M against essentially no borrowings, and operating cash flow covers any plausible obligation many times over.

Valuation — now vs its own history

This is the chart that matters most. Auto Trader's fiscal-year-end P/E has averaged 25.5× since FY17. Today, the trailing P/E (£4.94 share price ÷ ~33.8p TTM EPS) is ~14.6× — roughly 40% below its own multi-year mean and the lowest level since the company began trading publicly.

Loading...
Loading...

Eight-year average EV/EBITDA (excluding the FY21 COVID outlier): 18.6×. Current TTM: ~10.4× — about a 44% discount to its own multi-year history.

P/E (TTM)

14.6

25.5 9-yr avg

EV/EBITDA (TTM)

10.4

19.1 9-yr avg

FCF Yield (TTM)

7.1%

4.5% 9-yr avg

Peer comparison

Five comparable digital marketplaces / dealer platforms. The native ratios below are computed in each company's own reporting currency (USD for the three US peers, EUR for Scout24, GBP for Rightmove and Auto Trader). Compare the unitless ratios — the absolute revenue lines are not directly comparable.

No Results

The peer that matters most is Rightmove — same UK marketplace template, same sub-scale capex, comparable margins, similar buyback discipline. Auto Trader trades at roughly a 21% P/E discount and a 21% EV/EBITDA discount to Rightmove despite delivering equivalent operating margins and a marginally cleaner balance sheet. The discount is hard to defend on quality grounds; it is a market-pricing of slower near-term growth.

Loading...

The two highest-quality marketplaces — AUTO and RMV — sit on the right side of the chart. Auto Trader sits below Rightmove on the same horizontal: same quality, lower price.

Fair value scenarios

The third-party model-driven Fair Value field is unavailable for this run, so the table below uses three independent anchors:

  1. Reversion to own multi-year mean — apply 9-year average EV/EBITDA (~18.6×, ex-COVID) to TTM EBITDA of ~£410M
  2. Reversion to nearest peer (Rightmove) — apply Rightmove's 13.2× EV/EBITDA to AUTO's TTM EBITDA
  3. Sell-side consensus 12-month target — ~654p mid (range 470–890p) per the published consensus
Loading...

Current Price (p)

493.6

Consensus 12m Target (p)

654

Implied Upside

32.5%

The bear case implicitly says: "the market is right, this business is permanently a 10× EV/EBITDA business now." The base case requires only that AUTO trade in line with the most directly comparable UK marketplace (Rightmove). The bull case requires reverting to its own multi-year average — a multiple it traded at during quarters of slower growth than today.

Closing read

What the numbers confirm: Auto Trader is among the best-quality UK marketplaces by every internal measure — 63% group operating margin, ~45% ROIC, FCF in excess of net income, net cash, and ~10% revenue compounding. The model is unbroken; H1 FY26 just delivered another half of mid-single-digit revenue growth and double-digit EBIT growth.

What the numbers contradict: the popular post-results narrative ("growth is dead, structural decline") is not visible in the income statement, the cash flow statement, or the balance sheet. What changed in May 2025 was the multiple, not the cash flows. The stock now sits at the cheapest absolute and relative multiple in its public history while still returning ~£280M to shareholders annually.

What to watch: the H2 FY26 update (May 2026) and FY27 guidance — specifically (1) whether ARPR per retailer regains its mid-single-digit growth track now that the dealer-stock lever is normalising, and (2) whether Autorama (the loss-making vans/leasing arm) reaches break-even on its FY27 path. Either would close the credibility gap that produced the de-rating; failure on both would justify it.